Skip to content
Salt.
E-commerce · 🇳🇿 New Zealand

Zero-rated and exempt, used interchangeably

An NZ exporter conflating zero-rated and exempt supplies had been claiming input credits incorrectly for two years.

New Zealand e-commerce exporter, two-monthly GST. Client identity withheld — we publish names only with written permission, so this engagement is described by its shape rather than by who it was.

12

GST periods reviewed

2

Categories correctly separated

Refund

Net position after correction

The situation
  • The business exported a majority of its output and treated all non-domestic sales as one category.
  • GST returns had been filed on time but with the wrong classification underneath.
What we found
  • Zero-rated exports and exempt supplies were posted to the same account.
  • Input credits were claimed on a blended basis rather than by reference to the actual supply type.
  • One product category had been treated as exempt when it was actually zero-rated, understating recoverable input tax.
What we did
  • Separated zero-rated and exempt at the transaction level with correct GST codes.
  • Reviewed twelve GST periods and recalculated the input credit position.
  • Filed corrections in both directions.
The outcome
  • The corrected position produced a net refund, because input credits had been under-claimed on the misclassified category.
  • GST coding now happens at the point of sale rather than being adjusted at return time.
Start with a conversation

Recognise any of this in your own books?

Thirty minutes. We review where your books stand and where the money's actually going — no obligation.

Book a call