Skip to content
Salt.
SaaS · 🇸🇬 SingaporeScenario

A Singapore company's first-year filing deadlines, mapped

A Singapore company's first year carries three separate deadlines on two different clocks: ECI to IRAS within three months of financial year end, the ACRA annual return within seven months for a non-listed company, and the corporate tax return by 30 November. This is an illustrative example of how Salt approaches first-year compliance, using a Singapore startup as the profile.

Scenarioan illustrative example of how Salt approaches this problem. Not a description of a specific client engagement.

The business shape it describes: Singapore startup, first financial year end.

Scenario covers
Move from spreadsheets to a ledger, compliance calendar and first-year filings
Jurisdiction
Singapore
Sector
SaaS
The setup
  • Take a Singapore startup incorporated for its regional advantages, where the founders have focused on product and bookkeeping has been done in a spreadsheet.
  • The first financial year end arrives with no compliance calendar and no clear view of which filing is due to which regulator.
What usually turns out to be wrong
  • ECI due within three months of financial year end and not diarised, with no view on whether the waiver conditions are met.
  • The ACRA annual return deadline unknown to the founders, and the AGM requirement that sits alongside it unconsidered.
  • Spreadsheet records not adequate to support a corporate tax filing, particularly on expense substantiation.
  • CPF obligations for local employees running monthly in the background with no reconciliation to the payroll records.
How this would be worked
  • Migrate to a proper ledger and rebuild the first year from source documents, because every filing downstream depends on that reconstruction being finished.
  • Build a compliance calendar covering ECI, the corporate tax return, the ACRA annual return, the AGM requirement and monthly CPF, with each deadline expressed as a date rather than a rule.
  • Sequence the reconstruction against the earliest binding deadline, since ECI arrives well before the tax return and cannot wait for a perfect close.
  • Check the ECI waiver conditions explicitly rather than assuming either that it applies or that it does not.
  • Prepare ECI and the corporate tax return from actual figures. Filing stays with the company or its appointed tax agent, and the corporate secretarial filings stay with the company secretary.
Why we'd be the right fit
  • A first year has to be rebuilt from source documents before any filing can be made, and the deadlines do not pause while that happens.
  • Knowing where each Singapore obligation falls relative to year end is what lets the reconstruction be sequenced into an on-time filing rather than a late one.
What the business would be able to do
  • The company would be able to make each first-year filing from actual figures rather than from an estimate that has to be corrected later.
  • The founders would hold a calendar with dated obligations they operate against, rather than reacting to a reminder from a regulator.
  • Year two would start from a reconciled ledger, which removes the annual reconstruction entirely.

What we'd flag

Rebuilding a first year from spreadsheets is constrained by whatever documentation was actually kept. Bank data shows that money moved; without invoices and receipts, expense deductibility is harder to support, and that gap cannot be closed retrospectively.

Answers

A Singapore company's first-year filing deadlines, mapped

Start with a number

Recognise this shape in your own books?

Tell us where you trade and what shape the books are in. You get scope, price and a start date in writing within one business day — no obligation.

Get a quote